For
those of you familiar with the movie series Quarantine,
you may not know that it is loosely based off of a Spanish trilogy known as REC. The main difference between the two
movies is that one is simply a type of zombie movie while the other is about
possessions. Two different horror tropes to be certain but the fact that the
American versions skipped the possession-transferred-through-bites is a tad
strange; we have movies about exorcisms all the time in our country, why would
we worry about possessed people in this one particular scenario?
Because
we as Americans do not accept changes to our genres very easily. When Dawn of the Dead was remade, there were
tons of people complaining that zombies weren’t fast, and that the movie was
worse off for it, despite the fact that it made the whole ordeal a great deal
scarier. With Twilight, not that it’s
horror really, but you have people making fun of it on a near constant basis because it broke the norm and is unique
in the Vampire/Werewolf list of movies. Look at how Twilight compared to the entire Underworld
franchise; by taking what should be terrifying and tweaking it with a little
glitter, you make something that we as Americans as a whole mock, but also
enjoy. The Underworld franchise
played off of the old Vampire versus Werewolf idea that was made popular in
comic books in the late seventies and early eighties, but was in no way as well
received as Twilight. Why was this?
Because Americans do not accept change well. Twilight was marketed as teen
romance, steered out of the horror genre as quickly as possible, all in an
effort to make it appealing to the target audience.
Now
the target audience for Quarantine is
more adult than Twilight, so this
film was allowed to up the ante so to speak and introduce blood, gore and
swearing. There were sudden scares and tense moments, but all in all the film
was a semi-standard zombie movie that ran along the same vein as 28 Days Later (the virus creates
rage-fueled humans that might eat people, but pass on the disease through
saliva and/or blood) rather than Dawn of
the Dead (a physically dead body reanimated through mystical/scientific
means that results in a cannibalistic cadaver that varies in speed based on
which movie you’re in). Now since Quarantine
is a remake of REC it would stand
to reason they would carry over pretty much everything.
But
they don’t.
At
the end of the two movies, the surviving reporter and her camera man retreat
into a sealable loft that was supposedly owned by someone who never comes
around. In Quarantine, we find a
laboratory where someone is creating germ warfare, and an emaciated zombie
comes shambling from the darkness sniffing for the survivors before eventually
killing them. The zombie was still very human and fairly mindless. In REC, the reporter and the surviving
cameraman do the same thing but find a loft covered in news clippings and
religious paraphernalia (Crucifixes, pictures of Mary, etc.), the clippings all
talking about a famous case of a girl who was possessed by a demon. They find a
recorder that, when played, has a man that says he’s located the enzyme that
causes the possession to take hold but has not been able to make a vaccine. He
goes on to say the Vatican has said to let the possessed girl die, as there is
little they can do for her.
This
is when she makes her presence known, walking in the darkness from a backroom
with a hammer in one hand, her features twisted and demonic. She sifts through
garbage, obviously looking for someone as she heard them enter the loft, and
the reporter and cameraman move away. The cameraman is caught and beaten to
death with a hammer, before the reporter is dragged off into the darkness, as
it happened in Quarantine.
Now
we have a movie series in America where the sequel focuses on an outbreak in an
airport terminal, creating zombies that force the Center for Disease Control to
seal off the area. The sequel for REC had a team entering the apartment
building from the first movie with a priest looking for a blood sample from an
infected person. They use religious icons and mantras to keep the infected at
bay, and search through the building after discovering that they travel through
the air vents.
So
right here we have a divergence; one movie follows along the zombie route, the
other follows along the possession route. America did not get to see the
“religious zombies” I believe because the producers and Hollywood executives
didn’t think it would make as much money here if that was the plot, as it has
never been done here before; we’ve had mystic zombies, radioactive zombies and
virus zombies, but never possessed zombies. No, we Americans like our
possessions to be very clear cut, usually possessing a young woman and being
handled by a Catholic Priest or two (Exorcism,
Exorcism of Emily Rose, The Conjuring, etc.), with very defined victories
being pulled through in the end, either philosophically or in reality.
Sometimes evil gets a parting shot that makes the victory bittersweet, but in
the end good triumphs over evil, as it always should.
Not in REC
or any of its sequels (there are four movies all in all). In these tales,
there are no victories for the protagonists, usually taken from their grasp at
the very last second; pulling their chance for survival at the last possible
moment in a climactic event that has been building through the entire movie.
This is something that we as Americans cannot do with our films; foreshadowing.
If we try at it, it is usually very obvious and bludgeons the viewer over the
head with the event that will happen further on in the movie (in the remake of Evil Dead when we see the brother
repairing the door with a nail gun, everyone in the audience cringed as we knew
that would somehow be used later on). But foreign films bring things up in
subtle ways that make you gasp later on when it rears its ugly head to punish
the protagonist.
Like
I said, the differences here are because America just is not ready for things
to be changed. We don’t like to think
when we watch horror movies, we like to be scared. This is a problem that will
not go away unless we as a group focus on making Hollywood listen to our cries
for more intellectual horror movies. We can’t rely on Guillermo Del Toro and
Sam Raimi to bring us new inventive ways to be scared, we need to seek out the
indie authors and screen wrights and have their work pushed to the silver
screen. If we don’t do that, we really will all just end up having pleasant
dreams instead of the nightmares we so crave.
Sweet
Dreams, either way.
No comments:
Post a Comment